Geolam vs. Competitive Materials
Geolam vs Aluminum
- Superior aesthetic – real wood grain and color variation, not a powder-coated print
- Easy to install – arrives at job site ready to install and not requiring touch-ups
- Proven durability – over 35 years of performance in the field
Geolam vs HPL Phenolics
- Superior aesthetic – real wood-like texture, not a flat printed image
- Easy to install – arrives at job site ready to install and not requiring sub framing
- Durable and enduring – scratch and wear-resistant for long-term performance
Geolam vs Solid WPC
- Fire rating – ASTM E136 Non-combustible
- Easy to install – arrives at job site ready to install and not requiring furring
- Durable and enduring – scratch and wear-resistant for long-term performance
Geolam vs Rice Hulls/PVC
- Superior aesthetic – real wood-like texture, not a flat printed image
- Easy to install – arrives at job site ready to install and not requiring furring
- Durable and enduring – scratch and wear-resistant for long-term performance
Geolam vs Terracotta Baguette
- Lightweight – just 0.75 lbs/lft compared to 8.0 lbs/lft for terracotta
- Cost-effective – about half the material cost and installed cost per lineal foot
- Faster turnaround – typical lead time of 13 weeks (vs. 28+ weeks)
- Flexible design – custom profiles and colors available in lengths up to 19’8”
Geolam vs Natural Wood
- Easy to install – arrives at job site ready to install and not requiring furring
- Proven durability – over 35 years of performance in the field
- Low maintenance – requires cleaning only if dirty
